NEWS: SNP blasts MoD over North Sea patrol force

River-class 2Angus Robertson, the Scottish National Party (SNP)’s defence spokesman, has heavily criticised the UK government’s commitment to protecting the Scottish shores and the North Sea. The SNP minister, speaking to the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) in London, claimed that the Royal Navy was relying on fishing vessels and even social media reports to understand what was happening in northern waters while the bulk of the ocean going fleet remains in the south of England. He also heavily criticised the lack of a suitable replacement for the Nimrod maritime patrol aircraft which for so many years had been at the forefront of protecting the northern waters of the UK.

“As we approach publication of the strategic defence and security review it should be acknowledged that the UK has not taken northern regional security seriously enough and this must change with the new [Strategic Defence & Security Review]…While all our northern regional neighbours make defence, security and stability in our region a key priority, the UK has not. The UK did not even mention the High North and Arctic in the last SDSR. This must change.”

During his speech he highlighted that while the UK government has concentrated on operations against extremism in the Middle East it has failed to recognise the threat closer to home. He also brought to attention what he called “increasing foreign military operations” (i.e Russian air and naval forces) close to the UK and how the current defence strategy isn’t working and that to remedy this a permanent maritime patrol base should be established on the Clyde and a dedicated Scottish airbase be established.

Mr Robertson’s speech has produced both support and criticism. On the one hand he continues to highlight shortcomings that the MoD has been trying to address since the previous SDSR in 2010 namely the lack of a new dedicated maritime patrol aircraft. However his comments about the MoD using fishing vessels and social media to gather intelligence is not as surprising as it might first appear as fisherman have long been a source of intelligence to the Royal Navy since the service was formed in 1707. Indeed many of the world’s navies communicate regularly with their country’s fishing crews to plug gaps in intelligence coverage since not even the largest navies have enough ships and aircraft to patrol everywhere at once.

With regards to his calls for new military bases in Scotland there are those that question whether the UK government should invest in such expensive undertakings given that Mr Robertson’s party remain committed to Scottish independence. The question the rest of the country is asking is “Why should the rest of the UK fund a massive military project that could end up as part of the military infrastructure of what will be a foreign country?” The answer then for Mr Robertson would be to have Scotland fund their own bases but if this were to happen it would only further alienate those Scottish voters who are undecided about independence and put them in to the SNP camp meaning Scotland would be more likely to go independent.

The issue of Scottish nationalism cannot be ignored and both London and Edinburgh will have to find some harmony in regards to defence expenditure and posture regarding Scotland. However many Scottish voters, traditionally Labour voters, feel that Prime Minister David Cameron’s Conservative government does not represent them but rather they’re own interests alone and unless that mood changes the feeling in Scotland will remain frustrated and angry.

Advertisements

6 responses to “NEWS: SNP blasts MoD over North Sea patrol force

  1. I do agree that our current level of maritime capability is woeful. Nimrod was sadly lacking towards the end and in dire need of replacement; a state of affairs the government chose to ignore. Surely about the most disgraceful of the decisions made by the coalition was the one to retire the aircraft without providing a suitable replacement.
    However, I have to say that the SNP is being just a tad hypocritical in it’s comments; they push the independence argument and want rid of the nuclear submarines and then wonder that the UK government are reluctant to invest in ‘Scottish Defence’.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Apparently the Westminster government has spent, for years, a lot more money per head in Scotland than in England, perhaps in an effort to nullify the effects of the SNP. Googling it produces various figures, but the Daily Telegraph suggests more than £8 billion as an annual grand total. Perhaps they could use that to protect themselves?

    Liked by 1 person

    • I think the nationalist mood in Scotland at the moment has become a runaway train. I don’t think anything will settle the feeling there and I say this as a Welshman looking at the situation from outside the box.

      Like

  3. I think the wider picture is important here. Whether Scotland goes independent or not, there is the issue that we simply don’t have sufficient forces to monitor and protect our own country. With heightened activities in the Middle East, increased Soviet activity in our Airspace and waters, getting rid of Nimrod before obtaining a replacement has left a big gap in our defence. With the forthcoming retirement of Typhoon and Tornado aircraft, we have little in the way of defence nationally. If we were to be attacked I seriously doubt our Armed Forces would be strong enough to cope. Attacking forces would not invade Scotland and stop there. Scotland would be, as an independent country, the “weak underbelly”.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s