NEWS: RAF Poseidon acquisition axed

This news article is now out of date. The Boeing P-8 Poseidon acquisition has been given the go-ahead in the Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015. CLICK HERE TO VIEW

Many feel the P-8 has already won

US Navy P-8 Poseidon

According to an article in The Sunday Times the Ministry of Defence may have ditched a £2bn plan to buy a fleet Boeing P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft for the RAF to plug the gap left by the retirement of the Nimrod. The purchase of a Nimrod replacement was expected to be announced in the forthcoming Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) but the newspaper claims the plan to buy the Poseidon, seen as the preferred option, has been shelved after ministers declared that the aircraft were “fiendishly expensive”.

If true then this will raises fears that Britain’s four Vanguard nuclear missile submarines and Britain’s maritime interests at large could be inadequately protected especially in the wake of increased Russian submarine activity. The RAF has already had to rely on its allies at least once when UK waters appeared threatened by an unseen, underwater intruder. There are a number of alternatives to Poseidon with Lockheed Martin offering a heavily modified version of the RAF’s Hercules transport aircraft to fulfil the role earlier this year. It remains to be seen if the scrapping of a Poseidon deal has been made in preference to one of the more affordable options.


11 responses to “NEWS: RAF Poseidon acquisition axed

  1. Pingback: NEWS: RAF Poseidon acquisition axed | Defence of the Realm | Bring the heat, Bring the Stupid

  2. The Kawasaki P-1 would seem to offer a cost effective answer to fill the Nimrod gap. Perhaps BAE might offer UK/European market support for this project. What we don’t want is for the customer to keep changing their mind as appeared to have happened in the bad old days when the specs for the Nimrod MR4 kept being changed.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Reblogged this on Fighter Jet News and commented:
    The most obvious alternative would be from Kawasaki, but this latest cut gives the impression the British Government determines defence spending priorities based on the latest crisis rather than what the Armed Forces actually require.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Pingback: The Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015 | Defence of the Realm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s