The Queen sets sail

HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier

It has been one of the most ambitious naval projects in British history and last night the Royal Navy’s new aircraft carrier, HMS Queen Elizabeth, was finally launched last night. In order to head out, the giant aircraft carrier had to wait for the right tide to pass under the Forth Bridge. It is estimated that there was barely 20 inches between the aircraft carrier and the bottom as it passed under the bridge. The ship was supported by a flotilla of 11 tugboats to help the ship navigate its way out of the dockyard.

Defence Secretary Sir Michael Fallon commented;

This is a historic moment for the UK as our new aircraft carrier takes to sea for the very first time. This floating fortress is by far the most powerful ship ever built in Britain that will enable us to tackle multiple and changing threats across the globe.

HMS Queen Elizabeth is an enduring example of British imagination, ingenuity, invention that will help keep us safe for decades to come. She is built by the best, crewed by the best and will deliver for Britain.

For the next 50 years she will deploy around the world, demonstrating British power and our commitment to confronting the emerging challenges from a dangerous world. The whole country can be proud of this national achievement.

Commanding officer Captain Jerry Kydd said of his ship;

I think there are very few capabilities, by any country, that are as symbolic as a carrier strike capability…Submarines you can’t see, but these are very visible symbols of power and power projection.

The launch has been unfortunately marred by reports in the media that the vessel’s systems still run on Windows XP which following the cyber attack on the NHS – who operated similar software – earlier this year has led to questions over whether the ship is vulnerable to cyber attack. Navy chiefs have denied that there is a risk and that protective measures have been taken.



8 responses to “The Queen sets sail

  1. Nice ship but a white elephant without aircraft. We only have helos to but on her.
    Should have gone CATOBAR not STOVL, pleanty of choices for an airgroup then, not just the Troubled and expensive F35.
    Short sighted, like the decision to sell the Sea Harriers at bargain basment prices to the USMC for spares 😦


    • Only two choices for catobar, French or US. Without steam turbines the only real choice is Emals and thats a complete shambles


  2. The F-35 will iron out it’s issues. Just as the Typhoon did – it has taken almost 30 years for the Typhoon to mature. It’s easy to knock the queen Elizabeth-class, but the fact is, it is a terrific political tool which gives us leverage. The Russian’s are already blowing steam out of their ears because of these ships. The Kuznetsov’s Su-33s have to use a ramp and take of with minimal fuel and a light load of underwing stores. If the Queen Elizabeth goes to sea with 2 Type 23s, a Type 45, one Astute-class sub and the Bulwark or Albion, it will be a powerful asset – one that no other navy that the U.S. can achieve.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s